|From:||Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>|
|To:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|Cc:||PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 1/1/23 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
>> Hmm. Somehow the .out test files were not included.
>> Fixed with attached.
> Somehow you'd managed to duplicate some of the other changes,
> so the cfbot still didn't like that :-(
> Anyway, pushed with cosmetic changes. Notably, I left out the
> documentation changes after observing that we don't document
> "+infinity" separately for the numeric types. Given the lack of
> complaints about that I think it's fine to do the same here.
Thanks, Tom! No objections to your changes.
|Next Message||Thomas Munro||2023-01-01 19:38:25||Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?|
|Previous Message||Tom Lane||2023-01-01 19:21:04||Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps|