Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps
Date: 2023-01-01 19:22:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/1/23 20:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> writes:
>> Hmm. Somehow the .out test files were not included.
>> Fixed with attached.
> Somehow you'd managed to duplicate some of the other changes,
> so the cfbot still didn't like that :-(
> Anyway, pushed with cosmetic changes. Notably, I left out the
> documentation changes after observing that we don't document
> "+infinity" separately for the numeric types. Given the lack of
> complaints about that I think it's fine to do the same here.

Thanks, Tom! No objections to your changes.
Vik Fearing

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-01-01 19:38:25 Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-01 19:21:04 Re: +infinity for dates and timestamps