From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown |
Date: | 2015-03-20 23:44:03 |
Message-ID: | 550CB0C3.1020507@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/20/15 9:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>>> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't
>>>>>> believe I was the only one objecting.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's your feeling now?
>>>>
>>>> I'm prepared to yield on the point.
>>>
>>> OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method for
>>> 9.5, ("smart" to "fast"), or should we wait for 9.6?
>>
>> I'm up for it. I think it's long overdue.
>
> +1
+1, but I also like the idea of allowing SU to connect during a smart
shutdown. Even if you've intentionally chosen smart instead of fast it
still sucks that you can't find out what's actually holding things up
(and ps isn't that great a solution).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-03-20 23:51:51 | Re: GSoC 2015: Extra Jsonb functionality |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-03-20 23:27:40 | Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position |