| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown |
| Date: | 2015-03-20 14:44:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1277073161.1359019.1426862664871.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't
>>>>> believe I was the only one objecting.
>>>>
>>>> What's your feeling now?
>>>
>>> I'm prepared to yield on the point.
>>
>> OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method for
>> 9.5, ("smart" to "fast"), or should we wait for 9.6?
>
> I'm up for it. I think it's long overdue.
+1
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Christensen | 2015-03-20 14:54:01 | Re: [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-20 14:34:49 | Re: configure can't detect proper pthread flags |