Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments
Date: 2015-03-02 11:43:27
Message-ID: 54F44CDF.1010409@iki.fi
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/26/2015 01:32 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> But ... I thought we were going to raise the default for max_wal_size to
> something much higher, like 1GB? That's what was discussed on this thread.

No conclusion was reached on that. Me and some others were against
raising the default, while others were for it.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2015-03-02 12:04:10 Re: remove pg_standby?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-03-02 11:37:55 Re: remove pg_standby?