From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Split security info into current/historic |
Date: | 2015-01-28 19:39:00 |
Message-ID: | 54C93AD4.2040307@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 01/28/2015 10:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> <mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I tried to split support/security into current and historic pages (the
> later covering expired versions of postgres) ages ago and my patch was
> rejected. I can't find that now, and IIRC it was pre-Django anyway.
> Can someone remind me of what the restrictions around this were, if any?
>
>
> One of the things on the TODO list is to move that data into the db and
> generate the page, to make it easier update and less error-prone. IIRC,
> last time we talked about the split, we said we should do the db thing
> first, and then it could easily auto-split on "affects supported version".
Is the DB move really going to happen soon enough that it doesn't make
sense to split the page now?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2015-02-01 08:10:37 | patch extracting |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-01-28 18:44:31 | Re: Split security info into current/historic |