Re: TABLESAMPLE patch

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TABLESAMPLE patch
Date: 2014-12-18 12:14:25
Message-ID: 5492C521.203@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

v2 version of this patch is attached.

On 16/12/14 09:31, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 16/12/14 08:43, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>> Sadly when the jsonb functions patch was committed a few oids where
>> used, so you should update the ones you are using. at least to make
>> the patch easier for testing.
>
> Will do.

Done.

>>
>> The test added for this failed, attached is the diff. i didn't looked
>> up why it failed
>>
>
> It isn't immediately obvious to me why, will look into it.

Fixed.

>
>> Finally, i created a view with a tablesample clause. i used the view
>> and the tablesample worked, then dumped and restored and the
>> tablesample clause went away... actually pg_get_viewdef() didn't see
>> it at all.
>>
>
> Yeah, as I mentioned in the submission the ruleutils support is not
> there yet, so that's expected.
>

Also fixed.

I also added proper costing/row estimation. I consider this patch
feature complete now, docs could still use improvement though.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
tablesample-v2.patch text/x-diff 97.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-12-18 12:21:18 Re: Add generate_series(numeric, numeric)
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-12-18 11:12:44 Re: pgbench -f and vacuum