From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch |
Date: | 2014-12-16 08:31:04 |
Message-ID: | 548FEDC8.4040705@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16/12/14 08:43, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Attached is a basic implementation of TABLESAMPLE clause. It's SQL standard
>> clause and couple of people tried to submit it before so I think I don't
>> need to explain in length what it does - basically returns "random" sample
>> of a table using a specified sampling method.
>>
>
> Tablesample, yay!
>
> Sadly when the jsonb functions patch was committed a few oids where
> used, so you should update the ones you are using. at least to make
> the patch easier for testing.
Will do.
>
> The test added for this failed, attached is the diff. i didn't looked
> up why it failed
>
It isn't immediately obvious to me why, will look into it.
> Finally, i created a view with a tablesample clause. i used the view
> and the tablesample worked, then dumped and restored and the
> tablesample clause went away... actually pg_get_viewdef() didn't see
> it at all.
>
Yeah, as I mentioned in the submission the ruleutils support is not
there yet, so that's expected.
> will look at the patch more close tomorrow when my brain wake up ;)
>
Thanks!
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2014-12-16 09:01:47 | Re: NUMERIC private methods? |
Previous Message | Borodin Vladimir | 2014-12-16 08:24:22 | Re: Streaming replication and WAL archive interactions |