Re: pgbench -f and vacuum

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench -f and vacuum
Date: 2014-12-18 11:12:44
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGW6cuSCYjAR+LJKpxVzg1s5nscK5Cz8N=qs-PfTb7oRw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> If we care enough about that case to attempt the vacuum anyway then we
>> need to do something about the error message; either squelch it or
>> check for the existence of the tables before attempting to
>> vacuum. Since there's no way to squelch in the server logfile, I think
>> checking for the table is the right answer.
>
> Fair enough. I will come up with "checking for table before vacuum"
> approach.

+1 for this approach.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2014-12-18 12:14:25 Re: TABLESAMPLE patch
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2014-12-18 10:59:28 Re: .gitignore config.cache and comment about regression.(out|diff)