Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Noah Misch" <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup vs. Windows and tablespaces
Date: 2014-12-16 16:41:12
Message-ID: 549060A8.5060208@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/16/2014 06:30 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I'm not clear why human readability is the major criterion here. As for
> that, it will be quite difficult for a human to distinguish a name with
> a space at the end from one without. I really think a simple encoding
> scheme would be much the best. For normal cases it will preserve
> readability completely, and for special cases it will preserve lack of
> any ambiguity.

Agreed. Besides, this:

16387 E:\\Program\ Files\\PostgreSQL\\tbs

is almost as human-readable as this:

16387 E:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\tbs

It's obvious how the escaping works, just by looking at the file.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-16 16:42:56 Re: Commitfest problems
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2014-12-16 16:39:53 Re: Postgres TR for missing chunk