Re: planstate_tree_walker

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: planstate_tree_walker
Date: 2015-09-17 13:33:54
Message-ID: 5459.1442496834@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Here is a patch that *just* introduces planstate_tree_walker and which
> is hopefully correct. I stole the logic from ExplainPreScanNode,
> which I also refactored to use the new walker instead of duplicating
> the logic.

It seems a little odd to have removed functions from explain.c altogether
but left their header comments behind. Otherwise this seems sound.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-09-17 13:35:04 honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-09-17 13:17:58 Re: tsvector work with citext