|From:||Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|Cc:||noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org|
|Subject:||Re: inherit support for foreign tables|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
(2014/10/21 17:40), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2014/10/14 20:00), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Here are separated patches.
>> fdw-chk.patch - CHECK constraints on foreign tables
>> fdw-inh.patch - table inheritance with foreign tables
>> The latter has been created on top of .
>>  http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/540DA168.firstname.lastname@example.org
> To be exact, it has been created on top of  and fdw-chk.patch.
> I noticed that the latter disallows TRUNCATE on inheritance trees that
> contain at least one child foreign table. But I think it would be
> better to allow it, with the semantics that we quietly ignore the child
> foreign tables and apply the operation to the child plain tables, which
> is the same semantics as ALTER COLUMN SET STORAGE on such inheritance
> trees. Comments welcome.
Done. And I've also a bit revised regression tests for both patches.
|Next Message||Dave Page||2014-10-24 06:26:27||Re: Getting rid of "accept incoming network connections" prompts on OS X|
|Previous Message||Craig Ringer||2014-10-24 05:42:19||Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API|