Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Richard Huxton <richardh(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Date: 2003-06-10 21:28:43
Message-ID: 5408.1055280523@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Given that we're running out of time, I wasn't going to touch any of the
> comments in PostgreSQL.conf.sample. Instead, I was going to leave the
> comments as-is, and post extensive comments on Techdocs before 7.4
> beta.

I doubt anyone would object to improving the comments during beta; so
you don't need to consider that part something that has to be done
before feature freeze.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 21:29:42 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-06-10 21:25:49 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 21:29:42 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 21:27:30 Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 21:29:42 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 20:57:24 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list