Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

From: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, gearond(at)cvc(dot)net, jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
Date: 2003-06-10 21:25:49
Message-ID: 20030610212549.GT65470@perrin.int.nxad.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

[removed general@ ]

> > What if smaller not-quite-trade-shows were held in different
> > cities? I would be *very* interested in sponsering short seminars
> > that simply market Pg and maybe show some demo's and discuss
> > thinks like migrate to Pg, Administration, IDE options, etc.
> >
> > I used to rent meeting rooms at hotels for another venture and
> > that is a pretty cheap thing to do (include the coffee, tea,
> > cheese, yada-yada-yada). The questions is how to get folks to
> > attend...
> >
> > ..sound like mail stuffing party to me!
>
> Never underestimate how much you can do just by being a part of your
> local community. I'm giving a quick session tonight here in Denver
> to compare MySQL, Postgresql and Firebird.
>
> While I personally prefer Postgresql there are some things MySQL is
> particularly suited to as well, and some things that firebird is
> suited to as well.
>
> A fair and valid comparison of their features is a useful way of
> "selling" Postgresql to the people who need it.

Do you have any notes on the three that you could post? -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:28:43 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-06-10 21:22:28 Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:33:05 Re: increment_by@
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:24:36 Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o