Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Richard Huxton <richardh(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Date: 2003-06-10 21:29:42
Message-ID: 200306101429.43003.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom,

> I doubt anyone would object to improving the comments during beta; so
> you don't need to consider that part something that has to be done
> before feature freeze.

Oh, cool. OK, then ... the hard part is just deciding on what comments to
include. We'll work on that in this list.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:35:04 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:28:43 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:35:04 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] Postgresql & AMD x86-64
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:28:43 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-10 21:45:13 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-10 21:28:43 Re: Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list