| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com,Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>,Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bhushan Uparkar <bhushan(dot)uparkar(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Index Skip Scan |
| Date: | 2018-08-16 21:44:19 |
| Message-ID: | 53BB39FD-96F9-4858-9B6B-EF81CBB18221@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On August 16, 2018 8:28:45 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>One thing to consider is the pluggable storage patch, which is a lot
>more important than this patch. I don't want this patch to get in the
>way of that work, so it may have to wait a bit in order to see any new
>potential requirements.
I don't think this would be a meaningful, relative to the size of the patch sets, amount of conflict between the two. So I don't think we have to consider relative importance (which I don't think is that easy to assess in this case).
Fwiw, I've a significantly further revised version of the tableam patch that I plan to send in a few days. Ported the current zheap patch as a separate AM which helped weed out a lot of issues.
Andres
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-08-16 22:27:56 | Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-08-16 21:43:25 | Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling |