Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-22 17:31:14
Message-ID: 5399.1203701474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> So on reflection I'm now inclined to say we should not change what we
> are now doing, which is simply to allow the db owner to install and
> control access to the language.

+1. It's worth pointing out here that we just changed the rules in 8.3
to make this easier. We should at least wait to gain some field
experience with 8.3 before we conclude that we need to change them
again.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-02-22 17:34:14 Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-22 17:28:20 Re: Linking backend in one piece