Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
Date: 2014-05-08 21:48:42
Message-ID: 536BFBBA.6000307@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 05/08/2014 05:21 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I
>> don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the
>> cycles.
> I wasn't objecting, merely an observation. Note that Tomas mentioned
> he's okay with running 4 builds at once. My main point here, really, is
> that having a larger number of animals shouldn't be an impediment for a
> more complex permutation of configurations, if he's okay with doing
> that. I assume you wouldn't object to my approving four extra animals
> running on the same machine, if Tomas wants to go for that.
>

No, that's fine.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-05-08 22:39:11 Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-05-08 21:37:25 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API