Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?
Date: 2014-05-08 21:21:59
Message-ID: 20140508212159.GI6018@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I really don't get what your objection to the setup is. And no, I
> don't want them to run concurrently, I'd rather spread out the
> cycles.

I wasn't objecting, merely an observation. Note that Tomas mentioned
he's okay with running 4 builds at once. My main point here, really, is
that having a larger number of animals shouldn't be an impediment for a
more complex permutation of configurations, if he's okay with doing
that. I assume you wouldn't object to my approving four extra animals
running on the same machine, if Tomas wants to go for that.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-05-08 21:24:47 Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-05-08 21:21:36 Re: PQputCopyEnd doesn't adhere to its API contract