| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2018-12-13 23:20:39 |
| Message-ID: | 52aae11b-bfa5-6ccc-3b98-774f4836ab42@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/12/2018 19:55, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>> reindex table CONCURRENTLY test;
By the way, does this syntax make sense? I haven't seen a discussion on
this anywhere in the various threads. I keep thinking that
reindex concurrently table test;
would make more sense. How about in combination with (verbose)?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-13 23:28:15 | Can we remove the #fdef UNUSED code from nbtxlog.c |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-13 22:52:33 | Re: automatically assigning catalog toast oids |