Re: commit fest 2014-01 week 1 report

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commit fest 2014-01 week 1 report
Date: 2014-01-23 14:43:04
Message-ID: 52E12A78.5030802@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 01/23/2014 08:11 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> We started this commit fest with 103 patches and got off to a flyer,
> with 20 patches committed during the first week. Somehow we ended up
> with 113 patches at the end of the first week, but let's please leave it
> at that.
>
> I'm tracking down patch authors who have not signed up for a review.
> I'll also be following up with reviewers to send in their first review soon.
>
> It looks like we could especially use a few reviewers for a number of
> (small) Windows-specific changes. If you have access to that, please
> sign up.
>

I have picked four of these.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-01-23 16:03:33 Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-01-23 14:23:04 Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source