Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)
Date: 2011-04-04 20:57:45
Message-ID: 5291.1301950665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> OK. Please comment the crap out of whatever you do, or maybe even add
> a README. This stuff is just a bit arcane, and guideposts help a lot.

We already have a README for that ;-). PFA, a patch to
src/backend/utils/misc/README describing the proposed revised API.
If nobody has any objections, I'll get on with making this happen.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
GUC-README.patch text/x-patch 11.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Klyukin 2011-04-04 21:03:27 Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2011-04-04 20:47:26 Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations