| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? |
| Date: | 2001-08-08 22:39:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5250.997310355@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> If we decide to release 7.1.3 I'd like to see our patch for
> contrib/intarray too.
>>
>> Which one?
> Patch I've submitted last week. It's in current CVS
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1028099
That patch doesn't apply cleanly at all to REL7_1_STABLE. While I can
find the corresponding code, I'm not sure that making the changes is
a good idea; perhaps the patch depends on some of the previous (quite
extensive) fixes to work correctly? I'm inclined to leave 7.1 alone.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Ramsey | 2001-08-08 23:25:02 | Re: contrib/postgis spatial extensions |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-08-08 22:38:25 | Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-08-08 23:35:42 | Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2001-08-08 22:38:25 | Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3? |