Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

From: Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Date: 2001-08-08 22:38:25
Message-ID: 01080819382505.21677@bugs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

On Mié 08 Ago 2001 18:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > The list looks good to me as far as doing a v7.1.3 ... anyone object to
> > it?
>
> Okay, I'll wrap up the last couple of back-patches this evening...

When could 7.1.3 be out? I'm very interested in the patch to the
rewriteHandler.c file. I have just finished recompiling postgres wth the
patched version of the rewriteHandler.c, but would like to have a stable
7.1.3 version comiled on the main SQL server.

Saludos... ;-)

--
Cualquiera administra un NT.
Ese es el problema, que cualquiera administre.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Marques | mmarques(at)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica
Universidad Nacional
del Litoral
-----------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-08 22:39:15 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-08-08 22:34:22 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-08-08 22:39:15 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2001-08-08 22:34:22 Re: To be 7.1.3 or not to be 7.1.3?