| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Trivial Fix: use palloc_array/repalloc_array for BufFile file arrays |
| Date: | 2026-03-04 01:31:14 |
| Message-ID: | 5218079D-02C5-484C-922D-BCF908A55F91@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 25, 2025, at 11:34, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 25, 2025, at 11:12, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hackers,
>>
>> I noticed this error while working on [1].
>>
>> In BufFile, the fields is claimed as an array:
>> ```
>> struct BufFile
>> {
>> File *files; /* palloc'd array with numFiles entries */
>> ```
>>
>> However, it’s allocated by palloc_object():
>> ```
>> file->files = palloc_object(File);
>> ```
>>
>> And reallocated by repalloc():
>> ```
>> file->files = (File *) repalloc(file->files,
>> (file->numFiles + 1) * sizeof(File));
>> ```
>>
>> This trivial patch just changes to use palloc_array/repalloc_array, which makes the intent clearer.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Chao Li (Evan)
>> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
>> https://www.highgo.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <v1-0001-Use-palloc_array-repalloc_array-for-BufFile-file-.patch>
>
>
> Sorry for missing the reference of [1]:
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/aUStrqoOCDRFAq1M@paquier.xyz
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chao Li (Evan)
> HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
> https://www.highgo.com/
>
PFA v2:
* Rebased
* Updated the commit message
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-buffile-fix-misuse-of-palloc_object-and-use-array.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-03-04 01:39:07 | Re: Use allocation macros in the logical replication code |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-03-04 01:29:17 | Re: Is it OK to perform logging while holding a LWLock? |