Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date: 2013-07-23 04:04:42
Message-ID: 51EE00DA.2000809@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/22/13 10:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already)
>
> Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles
> have been going into bug fixing lately :-(

I just put you down as the committer on it, given Alvaro waved that way too.

A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that
Robert has been working on those quite a bit. I'm putting him down as
the committer on this last one.

If the CF drags on a bit due to committer time being spent on bugs,
given the date here I think that's OK. I would put next week as a loose
target for finishing these off. I worry a lot less about committers
keeping to their schedules than when there are 50 regular contributors
still moving around.

That leaves only 1 patch where I have no idea who will commit it:

access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-07-23 04:08:58 Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-07-23 04:01:52 Re: proposal - psql - show longest tables