| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
| Date: | 2013-07-12 19:18:15 |
| Message-ID: | 51E05677.6040703@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2013 10:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/2013 01:28 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> -- a couple of compromise proposals were made:
>>>
>>> a) that reviewers who do actual code modification of the patch get
>>> credited on the feature, and those who just review it get credited at
>>> the bottom of the release notes, or
>>>
>
> I'd probably say "substantial" or "non-trivial", but otherwise +1
Right cause if a reviewer ends up writing (or cleaning up) all the docs,
I would say they deserve very close to equal credit. As an example.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-07-12 20:32:52 | Re: SSL renegotiation |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-07-12 17:49:46 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |