Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Date: 2013-06-27 18:38:11
Message-ID: 51CC8693.3050305@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> If we're going to try harder to ensure that reviewers are credited,
> it'd probably be better to take both the commit log and the release
> notes out of that loop.

I'd pull the reviewers out of the CF app. Even in its current
implementation, that's the easiest route.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-06-27 18:47:48 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- straw poll
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-06-27 18:32:55 Re: Group Commits Vs WAL Writes