Re: C++ compiler

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ compiler
Date: 2013-06-25 15:52:27
Message-ID: 51C9BCBB.7010501@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/24/2013 09:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid; are
>> there any?
>
> We're avoiding C99-and-later features that are not in C89, such as //
> for comments, as well as more useful things. It might be time to
> reconsider whether we should move the baseline portability requirement
> up to C99.

The problem here is we lose the MS compilers which are not being updated
for C99.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-06-25 15:55:00 Re: Hash partitioning.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-06-25 15:47:08 Re: pgbench --startup option