Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date: 2018-09-26 16:45:10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Pushed. Now let's wait for the buildfarm to complain ...

gaur's not happy, but rather surprisingly, it looks like we're
mostly OK elsewhere. Do you need me to trace down exactly what's
going wrong on gaur?

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-09-26 17:04:20 Re: transction_timestamp() inside of procedures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-26 16:40:22 Re: Allowing printf("%m") only where it actually works