| From: | Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
| Date: | 2018-05-28 07:42:32 |
| Message-ID: | 5128104.C1GyuidneG@peanuts2 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:37:06 AM CEST Yuriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Can't see getting rid of those entirely. None of the github style
> > platforms copes with reasonable complex discussions.
>
> I disagree. A good example of complex discussions on github is Rust
> language tracker for RFCs:
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues
> and one concrete example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2327
> I have no any problem with complex discussions on github.
It is indeed hard to follow on github, and would be even worse with bigger
threads.
Email readers show threads in a hierarchical way, we can see who answered to
who, discussions can fork to completely different aspects of an issue without
being mixed together.
> Anyway, it's much better than tons of emails in your mailbox without tags
> and status of discussion.
A github thread does not show what I read / what I have to read, does it now ?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-05-28 07:44:32 | PGXS fails to byte-compile pgsql-ogr-fdw |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2018-05-28 07:06:05 | [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress |