| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 15:04:05 |
| Message-ID: | 511513E5.10104@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On 2/6/13 4:07 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I think one of them has, now: Gerrit. http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
I find Gerrit pretty useful, and I would support trying it out.
I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
You don't need to replace the commitfest app (if that's what you were
getting at), and Gerrit isn't an issue tracking system anyway.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-02-08 15:19:00 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-02-08 14:58:59 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-02-08 15:20:39 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-02-08 10:23:52 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |