Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date: 2013-02-08 15:58:27
Message-ID: 16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.

I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory,
and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their
tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
sure that the reviews get archived.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2013-02-08 15:59:13 Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2013-02-08 15:57:12 Re: Bug, Feature, or what else?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2013-02-08 16:07:42 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-02-08 15:32:50 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs