| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 15:58:27 |
| Message-ID: | 16562.1360339107@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their
> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If
> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes.
I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds
like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo
somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would
make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory,
and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful
when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their
tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making
sure that the reviews get archived.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2013-02-08 15:59:13 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-02-08 15:57:12 | Re: Bug, Feature, or what else? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2013-02-08 16:07:42 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2013-02-08 15:32:50 | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |