Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
Date: 2013-01-26 23:38:11
Message-ID: 510468E3.9000709@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/27/2013 12:04 AM, james wrote:
>> So, while no native 64-bit compilers are available for free as part of
>> Visual Studio Express 2012 (11), it doesn't matter much. The issue is
>> more that it's very much Microsoft's whim whether they release compilers
>> at all and if so, which ones, when and how.
>
> I think I have a pretty vanilla Visual Studio Express 2012 for Desktop
> and:
>
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64>.\cl
> Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 17.00.51106.1 for x64
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> usage: cl [ option... ] filename... [ /link linkoption... ]
>
> C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64>
>
> Am I misunderstanding the discussion here?
Yep, that's a cross-compiler, hence "x86_amd64". As I said, it doesn't
actually matter very much on an x64 host as the target arch binaries run
fine on the host arch. The only reason you'd need the native 64-bit
compiler is if you're compiling huge programs that cause the 32-bit to
64-bit cross-compiler to run out of memory. Not an issue for Pg.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2013-01-26 23:41:40 Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-01-26 22:54:43 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY