| From: | james <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Date: | 2013-01-26 16:04:35 |
| Message-ID: | 5103FE93.2020306@mansionfamily.plus.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> So, while no native 64-bit compilers are available for free as part of
> Visual Studio Express 2012 (11), it doesn't matter much. The issue is
> more that it's very much Microsoft's whim whether they release compilers
> at all and if so, which ones, when and how.
I think I have a pretty vanilla Visual Studio Express 2012 for Desktop and:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64>.\cl
Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 17.00.51106.1 for x64
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
usage: cl [ option... ] filename... [ /link linkoption... ]
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64>
Am I misunderstanding the discussion here?
Isn't that the 64-bit tool suite?
Does anyone care if the compiler is a 64 bit binary itself?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-01-26 16:27:28 | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-01-26 15:52:51 | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |