Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
Date: 2012-12-21 15:54:07
Message-ID: 50D4861F.5090602@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/21/12 4:49 PM, I wrote:
>> Won't this result in the word STRICT
>> becoming effectively reserved in contexts where it currently is not?
>
> It will, which probably is not ideal if it can be avoided. I also
> considered syntax like INTO STRICT NULL, but that felt a bit ugly. It
> would be great if someone had any smart ideas about the syntax.

Another idea would be to force the STRICT to be immediately after
INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2012-12-21 15:57:29 Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-12-21 15:53:26 Re: need a function to extract list items from pg_node_tree