Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?

From: David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Date: 2012-11-07 13:33:19
Message-ID: 509A631F.2010507@boreham.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 11/6/2012 9:16 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
> I've been benchmarking a E5-4640 (4 socket) and hyperthreading off
> gave much better scaling behaviour in pgbench (gentle rise and flatten
> off), whereas with hyperthreading on there was a dramatic falloff
> after approx number clients = number of (hyperthreaded) cpus. The box
> is intended to be a pure db server, so we are running with
> hyperthreading off.

It looks like this syndrome is not observed on my box, likely due to the
much lower number of cores system-wide (12).
I see pgbench tps increase nicely until #threads/clients == #cores, then
plateau. I tested up to 96 threads btw.

We're waiting on more memory modules to arrive. I'll post some test
results once we have all 4 memory banks populated.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2012-11-07 13:37:24 Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-11-07 11:43:09 Re: dbt2 performance regresses from 9.1.6 to 9.2.1