From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
Date: | 2012-11-07 13:37:24 |
Message-ID: | 1352295444.3774.109.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 20:31 -0700, David Boreham wrote:
> Was assuming it was 6-core but I just noticed it has HT which is
> currently enabled since I see 12 cores in /proc/cpuinfo
>
> Question for the performance experts : is it better to have H enabled
> or disabled for this generation of Xeon ? Workload will be moderately
> concurrent, small OLTP type transactions. We'll also run a few
> low-load VMs (using KVM) and big Java application.
HT should be good for file servers, or say many of the app servers, or
small web/mail servers. PostgreSQL relies on the CPU power, and since
the HT CPUs don't have the same power as the original CPU, when OS
submits a job to that particular HTed CPU, query will run significantly
slow. To avoid issues, I would suggest you to turn HT off on all
PostgreSQL servers. If you can throw some more money, another 6-core CPU
would give more benefit.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Boreham | 2012-11-07 13:45:25 | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
Previous Message | David Boreham | 2012-11-07 13:33:19 | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |