Re: GiST rtree logic is not right

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Pgsql Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST rtree logic is not right
Date: 2005-06-23 06:30:45
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9375@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'll look at problem after GiST concurrency. Fixing
> rtree_gist is bug a fix, not a new feature, so I'm not
> limited by 1 July.

Wont fixing rtree(_gist) require initdb, since the behaviour of the
operators will change?

... John

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-06-23 07:05:14 Re: GiST rtree logic is not right
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-06-23 06:19:46 Re: GiST rtree logic is not right