Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Date: 2001-01-18 20:53:44
Message-ID: 5056.979851224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
>> The fixed-size-array thing sounds like a gotcha waiting to bite someone.

> Agreed.

>> How big is the array, anyway?

> The current size is 100 deep. Is that sufficient for PostgreSQL or is
> this dependent on usage?

Mumble. I'd sure you could gin up a scenario where it fails, but
deleting 100 recently-used tables in one transaction doesn't seem like a
very likely situation.

Probably a more interesting question to ask is how graceful is the
behavior when that array fills up?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2001-01-18 21:07:05 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2001-01-18 20:01:18 Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems