| From: | Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems |
| Date: | 2001-01-18 20:01:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20010118150118.N1092@dothill.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-ports |
Tom,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:53:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> > With the above caveats, is the current functionality sufficient for
> > PostgreSQL's needs?
>
> The fixed-size-array thing sounds like a gotcha waiting to bite someone.
Agreed.
> How big is the array, anyway?
The current size is 100 deep. Is that sufficient for PostgreSQL or is
this dependent on usage?
Jason
--
Jason Tishler
Director, Software Engineering Phone: +1 (732) 264-8770 x235
Dot Hill Systems Corp. Fax: +1 (732) 264-8798
82 Bethany Road, Suite 7 Email: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com
Hazlet, NJ 07730 USA WWW: http://www.dothill.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-18 20:53:44 | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL Regression Test Problems |
| Previous Message | Jason Tishler | 2001-01-18 19:55:14 | Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch |