Re: Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Race between SELECT and ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT
Date: 2017-09-13 04:10:31
Message-ID: 50485ddf-2e20-f787-90a8-a3d8e161ac35@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/09/13 12:05, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 26 June 2017 at 10:16, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>> BTW, in the partitioned table case, the parent is always locked first
>> using an AccessExclusiveLock. There are other considerations in that case
>> such as needing to recreate the partition descriptor upon termination of
>> inheritance (both the DETACH PARTITION and also DROP TABLE child cases).
>
> Is this requirement documented or in comments anywhere?

Yes. See the last sentence in the description of PARTITION OF clause in
CREATE TABLE:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html#sql-createtable-partition

And, the 4th point in the list of differences between declarative
partitioning and inheritance:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ddl-partitioning.html#ddl-partitioning-implementation-inheritance

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2017-09-13 04:12:12 Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-09-13 04:09:41 Re: why not parallel seq scan for slow functions