Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Date: 2012-09-05 22:17:07
Message-ID: 5047CF63.8090405@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/5/12 5:59 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> I agree with this, even though in theory (but not in practice)
> creative use of unix sockets (sorry windows, perhaps some
> port-allocating and URL mangling can be done instead) and conventions
> for those would allow even better almost-like-embedded results,
> methinks. That may still be able to happen.

Sure, everyone who cares can already do this, but some people probably
don't care enough. Also, making this portable and robust for everyone
to use, not just your local environment, is pretty tricky. See
pg_upgrade test script, for a prominent example.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-09-05 22:25:47 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-05 22:13:21 Re: Draft release notes complete