Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

On 09/05/2012 09:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012:
>> 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>>> Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012:
>>>> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest
>>>> core API changes.
>>> I think you should get a buildfarm animal installed that builds and
>>> tests sepgsql, to avoid this kind of problem in the future.
>>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion. I'm interested in.
>>
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto
>>
>> Does it test only build-correctness? Or, is it possible to include
>> result of regression test for result to be alarmed?
> Yes, regression test diffs are also reported and can cause failures.
> As far as I know, you can construct your own test steps, if you want to
> do something customized that's not present in regular BF animals.

Looking at SEPgsql testing is on my long TODO list. I'll have to set up
a separate VM for it, as I don't habitually run SELinux.

cheers

andrew