Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [bugfix] sepgsql didn't follow the latest core API changes
Date: 2012-09-05 13:11:05
Message-ID: 1346850584-sup-7621@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of mié sep 05 08:30:37 -0300 2012:
> 2012/9/3 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> > Excerpts from Kohei KaiGai's message of dom sep 02 15:53:22 -0300 2012:
> >> This patch fixes a few portions on which sepgsql didn't follow the latest
> >> core API changes.
> >
> > I think you should get a buildfarm animal installed that builds and
> > tests sepgsql, to avoid this kind of problem in the future.
> >
> Thanks for your suggestion. I'm interested in.
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto
>
> Does it test only build-correctness? Or, is it possible to include
> result of regression test for result to be alarmed?

Yes, regression test diffs are also reported and can cause failures.
As far as I know, you can construct your own test steps, if you want to
do something customized that's not present in regular BF animals.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-05 13:11:20 Re: pg_upgrade diffs on WIndows
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-09-05 12:56:57 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol