Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?

From: John Lister <john(dot)lister(at)kickstone(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?
Date: 2012-08-23 18:09:00
Message-ID: 503671BC.7080204@kickstone.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 23/08/2012 16:00, Dave Cramer wrote:
> To be candid, I need help managing the patches.
>
> Many times the patches come in without test cases or without
> documentation. All of these things require me to spend time I don't
> have.
>
> Also many patches or requests are very specific "itches" which solve a
> particular problem for the submitter. Every new feature adds
> complexity and possibly negatively effects performance. It is useful
> to keep in mind that the driver is used by lots of other people who
> will not benefit from this particular feature request.
>
>
> So I am open to suggestions as to how to manage this better. I know
> that the main postgresql project has a system where other people
> review patches. This seems like it is a good idea.
>
> Notionally someone other than the submitter would review the patch.
>
Sounds like a good idea, I'm happy to review patches if required. Is
there a set of guidelines that need to be followed
in determining if a patch should be accepted?

John

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2012-08-23 18:16:08 Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2012-08-23 15:00:57 Re: setObject(...) with native Java arrays like String[] ?