Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1
Date: 2012-08-23 03:17:26
Message-ID: 5035A0C6.1040401@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08/22/2012 11:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I can reproduce the failure with 5.14.2
>> Me too, however it works for me with 5.14.1, looking more like a strange
>> perl bug.
> Curiously, I do *not* see the bug on my Fedora 16 machine, running
> perl-5.14.2-198.fc16.x86_64
>
> I wondered if Fedora is carrying a patch that fixes it, but none of
> their dozen or so patches look related:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl.git/tree/?h=f16
>

Possibly we need to look at the output of perl -V to see if there's a
difference.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-23 03:35:21 Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-23 03:08:25 Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1