Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1
Date: 2012-08-23 03:08:25
Message-ID: 29414.1345691305@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I can reproduce the failure with 5.14.2

> Me too, however it works for me with 5.14.1, looking more like a strange
> perl bug.

Curiously, I do *not* see the bug on my Fedora 16 machine, running
perl-5.14.2-198.fc16.x86_64

I wondered if Fedora is carrying a patch that fixes it, but none of
their dozen or so patches look related:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl.git/tree/?h=f16

Baffled...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-08-23 03:17:26 Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2012-08-23 02:48:09 Re: Unexpected plperl difference between 8.4 and 9.1