I'm in favour of ads if the ads actually generate net benefit to pgsql.
e.g. If they pay only for clickthroughs it's usually not worth having
ads. Or the ads use more bandwidth than they pay for.
The new site has broken links to docs:
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ ->User's Lounge -> Released docs:
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/ <- broken.
The new site also has a broken link to User's lounge - it goes to mirrors.
New site needs link to store.pgsql.com
 Not very likely that people will click on "Harmony Cruises" when they
are very busy looking for Postgresql info. They may remember the name for
later, but not click through.
At 11:05 AM 1/6/03 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>Personally, I'm in favor of ads if it is needed to offset the cost of
>and as long as the advertisers are companies which support Open Source.
>In fact, I was thinking of buying an ad myself.
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Steve Litt||Date: 2003-01-07 15:49:53|
|Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] www.postgresql.org|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2003-01-07 10:06:08|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde & Schonig|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Stephan Szabo||Date: 2003-01-07 15:27:49|
|Subject: Re: [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance|
|Previous:||From: Justin Clift||Date: 2003-01-07 14:21:37|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on e10k|