Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Thomas O'Connell" <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com>)
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] www.postgresql.org
Date: 2003-01-07 15:00:06
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.1.20030107223311.02e94500@mbox.jaring.my
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

I'm in favour of ads if the ads actually generate net benefit to pgsql.
e.g. If they pay only for clickthroughs it's usually not worth having
ads[1]. Or the ads use more bandwidth than they pay for.

The new site has broken links to docs:

http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ ->User's Lounge -> Released docs:

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/ <- broken.

The new site also has a broken link to User's lounge - it goes to mirrors.

New site needs link to store.pgsql.com

Link.

[1] Not very likely that people will click on "Harmony Cruises" when they
are very busy looking for Postgresql info. They may remember the name for
later, but not click through.

At 11:05 AM 1/6/03 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:

>Personally, I'm in favor of ads if it is needed to offset the cost of
>hosting,
>and as long as the advertisers are companies which support Open Source.
>
>In fact, I was thinking of buying an ad myself.
>
>--
>-Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Litt 2003-01-07 15:49:53 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] www.postgresql.org
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-01-07 10:06:08 Re: [HACKERS] Thank-you to Cybertec Geschwinde & Schonig

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-01-07 15:27:49 Re: [PERFORM] 7.3.1 index use / performance
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-01-07 14:21:37 Re: PostgreSQL on e10k