From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
Subject: | Re: logical replication apply to run with sync commit off by default |
Date: | 2017-04-14 18:02:46 |
Message-ID: | 4f9091ed-17a0-52f6-dc15-6a78f31c1118@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/13/17 17:52, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 12/04/17 06:10, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 3/24/17 10:49, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> Rebase after table copy patch got committed.
>>
>> You could please sent another rebase of this, perhaps with some more
>> documentation, as discussed downthread.
>>
>> Also, I wonder why we don't offer the other values of
>> synchronous_commit. In any case, we should keep the values consistent.
>> So on should be on and local should be local, but not mixing it.
>>
>
> Now that I am back from vacation I took look at this again. The reason
> why I did only boolean initially is that he other values just didn't
> seem all that useful. But you are right it's better to be consistent and
> there is no real reason why not to allow all of the possible values.
>
> So how about the attached?
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-04-14 18:10:12 | Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2017-04-14 17:33:59 | Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher |